Re: [PATCH 3/6][XEN][x86] Rename usermode macro

On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 07:43:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Why didn't your testing pick up the x86_64 build error?
> 
> arch/x86_64/oprofile/built-in.o(.text+0x1d09): In function `x86_backtrace':
> arch/x86_64/oprofile/../../i386/oprofile/backtrace.c:94: undefined reference to `user_mode_vm'

ouch, sorry about that.

the x86 and x86-64 patches has been compiled separately, which obviously
was a wrong thing to do...
I will do a full test on x86-64 next time I'm doing such thing.

-- 
Vincent Hanquez
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • "[PATCH
    • From: [email protected] (Vincent Hanquez)
  • [PATCH 3/6][XEN][x86] Rename usermode macro
    • From: Vincent Hanquez <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 3/6][XEN][x86] Rename usermode macro
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/7] dlm: overview
• Next by Date: [PATCH] FUSE: tighten check for processes allowed access
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/6][XEN][x86] Rename usermode macro
• Next by thread: [patch 1/3] swsusp: kill unneccessary does_collide_order
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]