Hi! > > I should take some sleep now, so I can't test the patch, but I don't > > think it will help. If someone has PF_FREEZE set, he should be in > > refrigerator. > > OK, so if that doesn't help, here's an alternate approach - this > lets xfsbufd track when its entering the refrigerator(), so that > other callers know that attempts to wake it are futile. Thanks, this patch helped. Pavel -- Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xfs-masters] swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1]
- From: "Barry K. Nathan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [xfs-masters] swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1]
- References:
- Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1
- From: "Barry K. Nathan" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1
- From: "Barry K. Nathan" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1
- From: "Barry K. Nathan" <[email protected]>
- swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1]
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [xfs-masters] swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1]
- From: Nathan Scott <[email protected]>
- Re: [xfs-masters] swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1]
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [xfs-masters] swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1]
- From: Nathan Scott <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1
- Prev by Date: [patch 158/198] IB: remove unneeded includes
- Next by Date: Re: Problem in log_do_checkpoint()?
- Previous by thread: Re: [xfs-masters] swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1]
- Next by thread: Re: [xfs-masters] swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1]
- Index(es):
 |