On Monday 11 April 2005 13:45, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> No luck yet (on SMP i386). How many disks are you using in each
> raid1 array? You are using one array for swap, and one mounted as
> ext3 for the working area of the `stress` program, right?
>
Right. I'm using two Seagate ATA133 disks (ide controler is AMD-8111) each
with 4 partitions, so I get 4 md Raid1 devices. The first one, md0, is for
swap. The rest are
~$ df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md1 4.6G 1.9G 2.6G 42% /
tmpfs 1005M 0 1005M 0% /dev/shm
/dev/md3 32G 107M 30G 1% /home
/dev/md2 31G 149M 29G 1% /var
In these tests, /home on md3 is the working area for stress.
The io scheduler used is the anticipatory.
> Neil, have you had a look at the traces? Do they mean much to you?
>
> Claudio - I have attached another patch you could try. It has a more
> complete set of mempool and related memory allocation fixes, as well
> as some other recent patches I had which reduces atomic memory usage
> by the block layer. Could you try if you get time? Thanks.
OK, I'll try them in a few minutes and report back.
I'm curious as whether increasing the vm.min_free_kbytes sysctl value would
help or not in this case. But I guess it wouldn't since there is already some
free memory and also the alloc failures are order 0, right?
Thanks
Claudio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
