Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Schmitt wrote:

 On Thursday 07 April 2005 09:25, Jes Sorensen wrote:

> [snip] I got it from Alteon under a written agreement stating I
> could distribute the image under the GPL. Since the firmware is
> simply data to Linux, hence keeping it under the GPL should be just
> fine.


 Then I would like to exercise my right under the GPL to aquire the
 source code for the firmware (and the required compilers, starting
 with genfw.c which is mentioned in acenic_firmware.h) since - as far
 as I know - firmware is coded today in VHDL, C or some assembler and
 the days of hexcoding are long gone.

First, there is *NOT* any requirement in the GPL at all that requires making compilers available. Otherwise it would not be possible, for instance, have a Visual Basic GPL'd application. And yes, it is possible.

Second, up until the present day I have personal experience with hardware producers that do not have enough money to buy expensive toolchains and used a lot of hand-work to code hardware parameters. So, at least for them, hand-hexcoding-days are still going.

HTH,

Massa



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux