On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:56:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Odd.
Yes, it is odd...
> > 2.6.11-bk9 works (actually it takes under 2 seconds, not 5-10).
> > 2.6.11-bk10 has the weird slowdown.
>
> Unfortunately that's a pretty bug diff (2 megs).
Yeah, I know. *sigh*
[snip]
> but you'd be getting a printk storm if that was triggering.
I'm not seeing a printk storm, at least, none that I can discern...
> > I'll see if I can isolate it any further.
>
> Please, that would help.
I'm working on it right now.
2.6.11 + linus.patch from 2.6.11-mm3 works.
2.6.11 + approx. 292 patches from 2.6.11-mm3 is broken.
2.6.11 + approx. 130 patches (a proper subset of the 292 patches) works.
(this is counting each subsystem bk tree as a single patch)
The diff between the latter two trees is still larger than the
2.6.11-bk9 -> -bk10 diff, but after one or two more iterations of
(psuedo-)binary search, it should be much smaller.
I'm planning to go as far as I can before going to bed tonight.
-Barry K. Nathan <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
