Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

* Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:

> > > So I'd actually prefer to get that mystery explained..
> > IIRC if the interrupt doesn't do the CPL
> > switch, the interrupt gate doesn't save
> > the stack, and so there may not be the
> > full "struct pt_regs" when the kernel
> > thread is interrupted.
> 
> Yes. But how do you have _such_ an empty stack when the interrupt 
> comes in? See what I mean? IOW, that requires that the kernel stack 
> would have only two words on it when the interrupt happens. How?
> 
> It may be a 4kB stack issue or something. Does this happen only with 
> CONFIG_4KSTACKS, and just after a stack switch to an irq stack, for 
> example?

i didnt have 4K stacks set. In all crashes, esp had the same pattern:

 esi: 009b63f9   edi: 00000001   ebp: f543a000   esp: f543bfc8

i.e. esp & 0xfff was 0xfc8 - while i think it should normally be 0xfc4 
(page boundary minus size of pt_regs == 0 - 0x3c == 0xfc4). So somewhere 
we lost 4 bytes of esp? An extra popl, or an addl $4, %esp? But why dont 
we crash in that case - it ought to shift all the pt_regs structure by a 
word, making it a completely senseless return frame. Any task in such a 
situation ought to at least segfault. So if this is during thread 
startup, i dont know how it survives the first execution.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux