Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik wrote:

We do not add comments to the kernel source code which simply state the obvious.

	Jeff
Whoa, kind of harsh, isn't it? I'm just trying to help.

Anyway, the problem at hand is: people do *not* think there is anything obvious.

For instance: many, many people do not consider binary hexdumps in .c/.h files as source code; if you think so, you should state it in writing, you know, to avoid lawyer attacks.

Another example: if you think it's obvious that the binary hexdump is another work, aggregated to the GPL'd .c/.h file, then you should state (again, in writing) which are the licensing terms of said work... otherwise, no-one has a written license to redistribute it, leading to... lawyer attacks.


HTH,

Massa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux