On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 01:10 -0400, Herbert Xu wrote: >On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:03:16AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: >> >> I received comments and feature requests from Herbert Xu and Jamal Hadi >> Salim, >> almost all were successfully resolved. > >Please do not construe my involvement in these threads as endorsement >for this system. Sure. I remember you are against it :). >In fact to this day I still don't understand what problems this thing is >meant to solve. Hmm, what else can I add to my words? May be checking the size of the code needed to broadcast kobject changes in kobject_uevent.c for example... Netlink socket allocation + skb handling against call to cn_netlink_send(). >-- >Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ >Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]> >Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ >PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- Evgeniy Polyakov Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Netlink Connector / CBUS
- From: jamal <[email protected]>
- Re: Netlink Connector / CBUS
- From: Guillaume Thouvenin <[email protected]>
- Re: Netlink Connector / CBUS
- References:
- Re: Netlink Connector / CBUS
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: Netlink Connector / CBUS
- Prev by Date: Re: iomapping a big endian area
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: Netlink Connector / CBUS
- Next by thread: Re: Netlink Connector / CBUS
- Index(es):
 |