On Apr 04, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: > What if we don't want to do so? I know I personally posted a solution Then probably the extremists in Debian will manage to kill your driver, like they did with tg3 and others. This sucks, yes. -- ciao, Marco (@debian.org)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Sven Luther <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- References:
- non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Sven Luther <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Michael Poole <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Sven Luther <[email protected]>
- Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- Prev by Date: Re: iomapping a big endian area
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC 1/6]SEP initialization rework
- Previous by thread: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- Next by thread: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
- Index(es):
 |